Nuclear Deal and Iran-US Relations: Consequences and Future Implications
President Donald Trump warned that if Iran does not sign the nuclear deal, a major strike would be launched. In response to this threat, Iran declared that it is ready to carry out missile attacks on the United States. This has led to the risk of war breaking out between the two nations within a span of just two days. This article explores why Iran refuses to sign the nuclear deal and the reasons behind the failure of negotiations.
Trump’s Aggressive Foreign Policy and its Impact on Iran-US Relations
Since taking office, President Trump has been altering the world order, particularly adopting a more confrontational approach with Iran. This has resulted in worsening relations between the two countries, day by day.
Iran, fearing that it could be attacked by the United States at any time, believes that possessing nuclear weapons is the only way to secure its defense. As a result, Iran has intensified its nuclear weapons production. Meanwhile, President Trump has consistently pressured Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program.
The Nuclear Deal: A Turning Point
In 2015, a nuclear deal between Iran and six world powers was signed, aiming to limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities in exchange for lifting sanctions. However, in 2018, Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the agreement and imposed economic sanctions on Iran. Despite this, Iran continued to engage in secret talks with the US and went ahead with its uranium enrichment program, violating the agreed limits.
In a second round of negotiations, President Trump has urged Iran not to pursue nuclear weapons and has presented a new nuclear agreement that would completely restrict Iran’s nuclear program.
Trump’s Ultimatum and Iran’s Stance
Trump wrote a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, urging Iran to sign a new nuclear deal within 60 days. However, Iran has maintained a firm stance against direct negotiations. Iranian President Masoud Beheshtian confirmed that while Iran is not opposed to negotiations in principle, it insists that the United States must first prove its credibility.
Trump has warned that if Iran refuses to sign the new nuclear deal, the United States will carry out an unprecedented missile strike on Iran. He also indicated that additional sanctions would be imposed on Iran, aiming to isolate the country internationally.
Iran’s Response: Ready for Missile Attacks
In response to Trump’s threats, Iran has stated that it is ready to confront any missile attacks from the United States. Iran’s military forces have reportedly prepared numerous missile bases across the country to defend against any potential strikes. In a video titled “Missile City,” Iran’s Revolutionary Guard showcased its advanced weaponry, including missiles capable of striking targets over 2,000 kilometers away.
Global Consequences of Escalating Tensions
If relations between the US and Iran continue to deteriorate, it could lead to global instability, affecting not only the Middle East but also the broader international community. Iran’s missile capabilities, which can target much of Europe and the Middle East, further heighten the danger.
Should a war break out between the US and Iran, it could lead to significant geopolitical shifts, particularly in the Middle East. It could also result in a broader international crisis, similar to other ongoing conflicts such as the Ukraine-Russia war or the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Diplomacy: A Narrow Path Forward
Although Iran is not opposed to negotiations on principle, it insists that the US must first prove its trustworthiness. Iran’s willingness for indirect negotiations remains, but direct talks with the US are not currently on the table. President Trump’s demand for a clear commitment from Iran regarding the nuclear agreement is critical for moving forward.
The escalating tensions between the US and Iran, if left unchecked, could reshape the international power structure and pose a significant threat to global peace and stability. The next few months will be crucial in determining whether diplomacy can still play a role in averting a major conflict.
