P.M.K. leader Anbumani Ramadoss raises several significant political and social concerns regarding Tamil Nadu’s governance, particularly focusing on Chief Minister M.K. Stalin and Minister Senthil Balaji. The key issues raised by him are as follows:
1. Senthil Balaji and Allegations
Anbumani Ramadoss points out that several years ago, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin had made serious allegations against Minister Senthil Balaji. However, now Senthil Balaji is being treated almost like a martyr, and Ramadoss questions whether this shift in perception is justified. He highlights the contradiction between Stalin’s past criticism and his current treatment of Balaji as a “martyr,” implying that such inconsistencies reflect the political dynamics of the ruling party.
2. The Adani – Stalin Meeting
Ramadoss raises concerns about the secretive meeting between Chief Minister Stalin and businessman Adani. There has been widespread speculation about this meeting, and Ramadoss questions why Stalin has not publicly addressed it. He underscores the serious corruption allegations related to Adani and how these have been ignored by the Tamil Nadu government. Ramadoss also criticizes the silence of coalition parties on this matter, suggesting that it reflects poorly on the political accountability of the ruling party.
3. Corruption in the Electricity Department and Adani’s Influence
Ramadoss highlights an ongoing case in the U.S. courts involving corruption in Tamil Nadu’s Electricity Department, linking it to Adani. He explains that the corruption has led to an increase in electricity charges, with many families in Tamil Nadu bearing the brunt of these hikes. He emphasizes that millions of families, including his own, are paying higher electricity bills due to the corruption within the department, directly impacting the lives of ordinary people.
4. Silence of Coalition Parties
Ramadoss critiques the silence of coalition parties, particularly MDMK leader Vaiko, on these issues. He states that while he has deep respect for Vaiko, the latter has failed to speak out on the corruption and misconduct of the ruling party. He criticizes Vaiko and other coalition leaders for their inaction, especially in light of the serious issues surrounding Adani and Stalin.
5. Judicial Observations
Ramadoss also mentions that judges have expressed shock over the fact that Senthil Balaji, who was released on bail, was immediately reappointed as a minister. He states that the judges have questioned this as a violation of democratic principles. This serves as a critique of the Tamil Nadu government’s handling of corruption allegations and ministerial appointments.
6. The Ruling Party’s Actions
Ramadoss calls for an investigation into the actions of the Tamil Nadu government, specifically accusing the DMK government of poor governance and a lack of transparency. He refers to a past incident in 2015 when the government opened the Semparambakkam Lake, causing significant damage. He compares that to the current situation with the Sathanur Dam release, questioning why these actions are not being addressed by the government.
7. Impact on the Public
Ramadoss stresses the direct impact of these political and administrative failures on the people of Tamil Nadu. He points out that 2 crore families are suffering due to the rise in electricity bills and the ongoing mismanagement of resources. He calls for immediate action from the government to address these issues and ensure public welfare.
This statement outlines various political concerns, highlighting inconsistencies in government actions, allegations of corruption, and the impact of these issues on the everyday lives of the people of Tamil Nadu. Ramadoss advocates for greater transparency, accountability, and action from the state government, particularly regarding corruption and the welfare of the public.
