I am not criticizing intentionally, I am criticizing because I don’t want to…. Seeman’s action

Yes, Naam Tamilar Party Coordinator Seeman has said that there is no need to criticize E.V. Ramasamy. What he said was, “I am not criticizing intentionally, I am criticizing because I don’t want to.”

Seeman’s Statement on E.V. Ramasamy and Tamil Nadu Politics

Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) coordinator Seeman recently campaigned in support of his party’s candidate Seethalakshmi for the Erode East by-election. During his speech, he expressed his views on Tamil Nadu’s political landscape, government actions, and the socio-political movements in the state.

One of the key statements Seeman made was regarding E.V. Ramasamy (Periyar):
“I did not criticize him intentionally; rather, I had to criticize him because it was necessary.”

Seeman’s Criticism of Tamil Nadu Politics

In his speech, Seeman strongly criticized the current political scenario in Tamil Nadu, stating:

  • The ruling parties are working towards deceiving the people rather than serving them.
  • The government’s actions are focused solely on elections rather than long-term welfare.
  • Political leaders, who should work for the people and the rights of Tamils, are instead prioritizing their personal and electoral benefits.

Seeman’s Stance on E.V. Ramasamy

E.V. Ramasamy, widely known as Periyar, is a significant figure in Tamil Nadu’s social justice movement. While Periyar fought against caste oppression and social inequality, he has also been a subject of debate due to some of his views and actions.

Seeman stated that he did not criticize Periyar out of personal intention but did so because he believed certain actions of Periyar were detrimental to Tamil culture, heritage, and identity.

His concerns included:

  • Periyar’s views sometimes targeted Tamil identity and traditions rather than just caste-based discrimination.
  • Some of his actions, according to Seeman, leaned in favor of North Indian ideologies rather than preserving Tamil culture.

Social Justice and Tamil Nadu Politics

Seeman also questioned the effectiveness of social justice movements in Tamil Nadu today:

  • Are these movements truly benefiting the oppressed communities, or are they being used as political tools?
  • Are political parties exploiting social justice for electoral gains instead of bringing real change?
  • Is Tamil unity being deliberately divided through these movements?

Naam Tamilar Katchi’s Vision

Under Seeman’s leadership, Naam Tamilar Katchi continues to advocate for:

  • The preservation of Tamil identity, language, and culture.
  • A political system that prioritizes people’s welfare over electoral calculations.
  • True social justice that does not compromise Tamil heritage.

Seeman’s Perspective on Tamil Nadu’s Political Landscape

Some key points from Seeman’s criticisms include:

  1. Tamil Identity and Heritage: Tamil Nadu should uphold its unique culture and traditions. However, some social justice movements, in the name of reform, have allegedly undermined Tamil heritage.
  2. Role of Political Parties: Instead of working for the welfare of Tamils, political parties focus only on securing votes and retaining power.
  3. Periyar’s Ideology: While Periyar fought against caste oppression, Seeman argues that some of his actions led to the erosion of Tamil identity.

Conclusion

Seeman’s statements reflect his ongoing critique of Tamil Nadu’s political structure, the role of social justice movements, and the preservation of Tamil identity. He emphasized that his criticism of E.V. Ramasamy was not out of personal animosity but out of necessity, as he believes some of Periyar’s actions negatively impacted Tamil culture.

His views continue to spark debate, especially regarding the balance between social justice and Tamil heritage, and the role of political movements in shaping the future of Tamil Nadu.

Facebook Comments Box
Latest news
Related news